And, of course, if you want to be able to scan documents with the integrated camera, then you only have one choice. With the additional memory and storage, as well as the larger capacity battery, the TUCP would also be a better choice if you plan on using more demanding apps or will be doing a lot of multi-taking. ![]() However, if your workflows require more keyboard-based input (such as emailing, word processing etc.) then the TUCP would be the best bet. I think if you will primarily be using the tablet for tasks that use stylus-based input (such as note-taking, annotating etc.) then the NA3C is going to be the better choice because it is thinner, lighter and has a more satisfying “scratchy” writing feel. Having not tested either device yet (my NA3C is currently being shipped), it’s quite difficult to answer this and will depend on each individual’s use case. Consequently, I’ve had several messages from people asking if they should buy the NA3C now or wait until the TUCP is released. Which one to buy?Īt the time of writing, the NA3C was available to buy with the TUCP being available in a couple of weeks. In terms of price, the TUCP costs $650 compared to the NA3C, which is $150 cheaper at $500. There are some differences to the physical dimensions of the two e-ink tablets, with the Note Air3 C being slightly wider and taller, but almost a millimetre thinner. In addition, it has a rear-facing camera (designed to be a document scanner) and an optional keyboard folio with trackpad which are not available on the NA3C. ![]() It also has a larger 4600mAh battery, compared to the NA3C’s 3700mAh. In terms of hardware, the TUCP has a third more memory (6Gb rather than 4Gb) and double the storage capacity (128Gb rather than 64Gb). The surface of the NA3C’s screen is also different, having a paper-like screen protector installed that makes the tactile writing feel scratchier/grainier than the smoother, glossier screen of the TUCP. ![]() In contrast, the launcher on the Tab Ultra C Pro is more akin to a regular Android tablet/phone with customisable app buttons and widgets. So, what are the differences?Īs I just mentioned, the Note Air3 C has a slightly different user interface because it uses Boox’s older app launcher – this is a left sidebar with non-customizable buttons for Library, Store, Notes, Storage, Apps, and Settings. They also both run Android 12 and have (almost) the same software – the user interface is slightly different but they both have the same apps and app features. They both have a frontlight (with temperature settings), speakers, microphone, g-sensor, Bluetooth, Wi-fi, Fingerprint scanner, and MicroSD card slot. They are also both powered by a Qualcomm Octa-core processor, however, the NA3C has a speed of 2.4GHz, whilst the TUCP is 2.8GHz. How Boox Classify their Productsīoth the NA3C and TUCP have a 10.3″ Kaleido screen and therefore have the same resolution and PPI specs. First the similarities…īoox Super Refresh (powered by an onboard GPU) is something that I always thought would be reserved for Boox’s Tab line of products but this feature has now also been added to the Note, further blurring the line between what Boox classify as “ ePaper Tablet PCs” and “ E Ink Tablets“. ![]() With so many similarities between these two 10.3″ colour e-ink tablets, it can be difficult to decide which one to buy, so in this post I wanted to quickly go over what the main differences are and what I think are the best use cases for each device. Boox recently launched two new products the Note Air3 C (NA3C) and the Tab Ultra C Pro (TUCP).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |